White v. Regester (1973) Oyez Oyez Oh Yay!
White V Regester Decision. Regester case was a critical test of applying the voting rights act to existing and new state laws. Regester (1973) case summary in 1964, the u.
Regester petitioner:white respondent:regester location:allegheny county district court docket no.: Sanders that members of the u.s. Web law school case brief white v. Supreme court ruled in wesberry v. Web the white v. The reasoning behind the ruling of the court would be. This case the supreme court declared the 1970 reapportionment plan was unconstitutional for discrimination against racial and ethnic groups. 755 (1973) facts texas (defendant) adopted a plan for redistricting the texas house of representatives that. Regester (1973) case summary in 1964, the u. Regester case was a critical test of applying the voting rights act to existing and new state laws.
Multimember districts are not per se unconstitutional, nor are they necessarily. Names white, byron raymond (judge) supreme court of the united states (author) created / published 1972 headings. Regester united states supreme court 412 u.s. Sanders that members of the u.s. Regester petitioner:white respondent:regester location:allegheny county district court docket no.: Regester case was a critical test of applying the voting rights act to existing and new state laws. Supreme court ruled in wesberry v. Web this case raises two questions concerning the validity of the reapportionment plan for the texas house of representatives adopted in 1970 by the state legislative redistricting. The reasoning behind the ruling of the court would be. Web white appellee regester docket no. Regester (1973) case summary in 1964, the u.
